Saturday, January 22, 2011

Items Worth Something In 200 Years

WHILE THE NATIONAL LEADERS DISCUSS WITH FIOM disobedience HOW TO INCLUDE THE CONFLICT ... VENERDI'21 ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR FAILURE TO GIVE THE WORD TO WORKERS FROM THE MEETING THIS VENETIAN DELL'ESTABILISHMENT FIOM

The first of several actions taken by the Fiom Venetian shipyard strike of 28 January, has resulted in a comparison almost alone among political actors of institutional "left" and "center-left" in the Venetian PD and IDV also sat quietly in front of the flags of Fiom. Venetian anomaly to the left? As we shall see, is quite another matter.
In public, few young people, many fellow workers and retirees, and about twenty of the Cobas Bangladeshi workers arrived with a flyer on the new fascism and the situation in Fiat Fincantieri. Also widespread in the special room on the agreement of Fiat Workers Communist League. Attention of many comrades in our presence, and absence for surgery, initially expected, "given" by the moderator, a representative of Cobas Fincantieri. Intervention then made impossible by a sudden change program for "lack of time", which then drove the workers of the Cobas present to leave the room before the deadline, in a clear gesture of criticism, but does not affect anything to the initiative, as it emerged as a radical critique the type of debate, a dispute would not have been understood. Outside the hall, meeting place for workers on the Cobas, to decide how to behave in future and new attitudes "censorship" of the false left Venice.
than its set in the initiative, there was only room for the intervention of a senior Communist worker, rather focusing on the critical and demands a heritage that workers should not be abandoned, but it was an intervention as a situation to complain that the same "buddies" have failed. And action towards the end, a delegate of the RSU Fincantieri quite known for its presence in different round tables, Castigliego, arrived breathless at the end of the debate disagree with grave words and bright tones, the provincial representative of the PD, which, like previously had a representative of IDV (who even acknowledged the existence of a problem with the new law of "representativeness", complaining that, alas, would come back to the old factory councils, at this rate ), focused sulla necessità di “affrontare il problema”, ecc. Il problema insomma da affrontare secondo alcuni nella falsa “sinistra” sarebbe costituito anche dalle “motivazioni” del padronato, spinto, porello, a dover incrinare diritti e Patto Costituzionale, con quanto ne è seguito (in particolare lo Statuto dei lavoratori). Su questo la posizione della Fiom espressa è stata molto critica, nulla da dire di particolare sul punto, così come sia Chinellato che altri interventi hanno ricordato l’attacco al CCNL, il tentativo ora di portare la contrattazione sul campo aziendale con perdita di diritti e svendita delle condizioni di lavoro pur di portare a casa la retribuzione.
La moderatrice, Loredana De Checchi, della “Cgil che vogliamo”, si è schierata apertamente per la difesa dei diritti, ma nessuno in sala si è azzardato a parlare dell’anniversario del Partito Comunista, né tanto meno di lotta per il socialismo, il Castigliego ha perorato, pur se vigorosamente sul piano verbale, l’intervento “parlamentare” della politica della “sinistra”, un po’ poco visto ciò che ha già messo in campo la destra ed il padronato. Il rappresentante del PD ha perorato la caduta del governo Berlusconi e la nascita di un “nuovo governo”, ma questo in realtà non ha avuto modo di spiegarci, se si trattava di una riproduzione in facsimile degli Antiope squalid and Prodi governments D'Alema-1-or 2 of the Prodi government, more careful about safety, but also ready to dive the pants to the rise of the first scandalino, this award as we have seen, has done nothing for the Fascist government of employers.
It seemed latent need for a political expression to the movement in the field, from many companions there was a greater need for discussion, which rarely has been married to the words of the speakers. In some passing Castigliego trying to flog the PD, in the words of two old comrades. The "battle" promised by the PRC, or rather by the "Federation of the Left", ie Bonzo, who only three months ago declaimed the "production of excellence" Fincantieri, and today it lowered its goodness to organize banquets up to 100 in two days across the Veneto to the strike. Commendable effort, with which perhaps you could build on top militant far more than 100 "Banquet".
Latent also confusion, cultural subordination, this means the disproportion between the master and control its media, and means of communication available to the "left" and "workers," skilled in the equivalence " Fiom. This is because in anything but revolutionary concepts that exist between gli oratori, sfugge che è la lotta il passaggio necessario, e non la “comunicazione”, che comunica molto di più la lotta di mille banchetti, come sfugge loro che Cgil-Cisl-Uil è ormai morta, e che ci sarà solo Sindacato di classe in costruzione e Sindacati dei padroni, fino allo scontro definitivo.
Sfuggendo loro questo, evidente non saranno presenti allo scontro definitivo, mentre la attenzione ma anche le domande anche queste “latenti” tra i presenti (compreso un compagno che ha interrogato il segretario provinciale della Fiom sul che faranno quelli che hanno votato no, e che ancora sono in Cig, al loro rientro), traspariva verso qualcosa di più, che tuttavia non è uscito, tra le bandiere rosse ed i toni “aplomb” del dibattito.
Ancora non ci siamo. Domani l’apparato nazionale della Fiom sarà a discutere con i capi delle polizie politiche di movimento, i cosiddetti “disobbedienti”, allo scopo certo, di potersi “unire contro la crisi” e non contro il capitalismo.
Ancora non ci siamo. Permane la logica delle O.S. sopra e dei lavoratori sotto.
Ancora non ci siamo. Sono comunisti, e non hanno nemmeno nominato Antonio Gramsci ed il PC d’I, nemmeno una volta. Solo, il rappresentante della FdS, ad un certo punto, parlava della lotta “sconfitta ma con grande dignità” the "1921", meaning the result of two years some red, but carefully refraining from even naming the Fiat factory occupations of 1919-1920. An amnesia?
also be recorded, and the presence of the attentive public, even the total absence of the political classes of the left "revolutionary".
The workers of the Cobas Fincantieri were not alone, were among other workers, but they were alone. Because racism exists, and is another word that was not named even once in the debate.
Veneto is definitely a little 'back, and Margaret is no exception, if we look organizations "historic" the labor movement. But be careful. There is a revisionism here. What, after 1968-1969, the historical organization of the working class? After the struggles of workers' autonomy, strictly censored here, and certainly tomorrow and the day after co-managed with the consent of convenience and the rewriting of the duo-Negri Casarini, the modern fascism lingers even when you least expect it.

Circle Worker Communist Workers Venice

0 comments:

Post a Comment